Feature / Other Reviews
Review: Dawn of the Dead

Words: Jeff C. • Posted pre-2010

I will be honest here. I have always loved horror movies but never got around to seeing the original Dawn Of the Dead before the re-make. In the past, I had never really experienced any of the real famous zombie movies, such as The Night, Dawn, Day series, Zombie, etc. The idea of green faced humans with their arms outstretched in front of them groaning and biting screaming people like that Michael Jackson video always seemed a little redundant and stupid to me, that is, until I saw 28 Days Later. The fact that the Trainspotting director did this movie made me want to see it, not because I loved Trainspotting or zombie movies, but because I love horror movies. Also the fact that the zombies didn't do the drunken stagger like in older movies, had an actual storyline, and didn't look incredibly lame intrigued me. I saw 28 Days Later a few times in theatres, and thouroughly enjoyed it. I heard about Dawn of the Dead being re released, changing the story a good deal, and making the zombies run, I was pretty excited to see it. I bugged my girlfriend about it and when we finally went, and sure enough I was entertained from the start to the ending of the credits.

The acting was above par for the most part, especially by the main character who's name slipped my mind, but also plays the blonde girl in the movie Go! I didn't find anything wrong with the story, and thought it moved at a very reasonable pace, starting with no backstory or plot setup, but dived right into the action. This movie didn't fuck around, in the first 5 minutes theres already a huge number of people dead. The one real complaint I have is that there were a lot of characters, and by a lot, I mean a lot. There were tons of people that stayed throughought the bulk of the movie, and it became more of an annoyance as you knew most of them were going to die by the end, you were just waiting for it to happen.

Right after seeing the remake, I bought the original, due to everyone saying how the remake couldn't even compare. I am still not really sure what to think. The original has many more flaws, such as being way too long (over two hours for a zombie movie?) and lack of modern make up and special effects, but I think in general the original creates a much creepier atmosphere, and has a few cooler parts. Of course without the original, the remake would never have existed, so credit is given where it is due. I also suggest to everyone that they see the original version first, so they know at least what to expect as far as a general plot for the remake.

Im conclusion, the original is a better movie, it makes you think more, and draws you in, as the remake is a more action oriented, horror movie for the year 2004. I am sure I will end up watching the remake more, as it's easier to sit through, and much shorter. Overall a great movie, that I think any fans of horror or zombie movies should check out, whether you are one of those people that claims to hate current horror movies or not.

8.0/10

Jeff C.

Related features

Wagemaker

One Question Interviews • December 10, 2025

Thomas Harris (Wagemaker) SPB: You went from a full band to doing Wagemaker as a one-person project. Now you’re a duo. What’s the perfect number of people for a band? Harris: My name is Thomas Harris and I sing and play bass alongside Jason LaVeris’s (drums) in the group Wagemaker. … Read more

She/Her Records

One Question Interviews • December 9, 2025

Liza & Misha (She/Her Records) SPB: After the SHEHERCOMP001 when did you know you were going to release albums/EPs/etc? . She/Her Records: We always planned to do solo releases following the first TDoV compilation. SARCOMA was enthusiastic about doing a solo release with us since we first posted our manifesto, … Read more

Glueman

One Question Interviews • December 8, 2025

Matt Glueman (Glueman) SPB: Your new album is simply titled “III”. What about a simple/to-the-point title appeals to you? Matt: Well, we love The Spits. They don’t have album titles, so why should we? GLUEMAN III.  Read more

Pulley and Fire Sale - Double interview

Interviews • December 6, 2025

When two bands come together on a split release, it’s more than just sharing music on vinyl. It’s a conversation in sound. Pulley and Fire Sale recently teamed up for a split 7" through Negative Progression Records that showcases both of their unique voices while still feeling like a cohesive … Read more

Guest Column: Allegedly Records

Regular Columns • December 3, 2025

Music touches the heart and soothes the soul. Through personal connection and community it reaches far beyond a listening experience. While it plays a role in our overall well-being, though, it's only part of the bigger equation. Through the mutual connections that music has brought us at SPB, we learned … Read more

More from this section

Review: The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2003

Other Reviews

In 1974, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre was released. The film became known for sparking a myriad of "slasher" films and cheese/camp horror, which is actually rather sad, since the films TCM often gets credit/blamed for are not all that relatable to Tobe Hooper's masterpiece. The comparisons are a mere symptom … Read more

Review: Kill Bill, Vol. 1

Other Reviews

As an employee of Blockbuster, it's easy to see that where moviegoing is concerned, there's always a bold line that separates the Happy Gilmores from the Punch-Drunk Loves. I'm referring specifically to those who think that Adam Sandler's career went downhill by starring in an ironically-labeled "stupid, pointless art film," … Read more

Review: Death Race 2000

Other Reviews

In the days of 1975, a lot of shit was goin' down. I can't think of anything off the top of my head, but there was. Oh! Wait, that OPEC thing . . . no, that was early 80's. Whatever, stuff happened. Despite all this, Roger Corman came out with … Read more